Disclaimer

  • Some articles on this website are partially or fully generated with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools, and our authors regularly use AI-based technologies during their research and content creation process.

Some Populer Post

  • Home  
  • Think Backwards: Redefine ‘Done’ by Starting From the Finish in Agile
- Agile & Scrum Practices

Think Backwards: Redefine ‘Done’ by Starting From the Finish in Agile

Think backward: redefine “Done” to stop rework, combat hidden technical debt, and force real delivery standards. Learn how it changes everything.

start with finished product

In the world of Agile development, teams often rush to begin work without clearly defining what completion actually means, leading to confusion, rework, and mounting technical debt. The solution lies in thinking backward, starting from the desired end state to establish a thorough Definition of Done before any development begins. This approach establishes a shared set of criteria that determines when a product increment is genuinely complete and ready for release.

Working backward from the finish means identifying what “done” looks like for customers first, then aligning team efforts with these end-state quality expectations from the outset. This backward planning prevents the accumulation of undone work that often piles up across sprints, creating technical debt that compounds with each iteration. When teams have end-state clarity, they eliminate ambiguity about completion standards across the entire development organization. A clear process mapping helps teams visualize and align these end-state criteria across stakeholders.

A thorough Definition of Done includes specific, measurable criteria. All code must undergo thorough verification through unit, integration, and end-to-end testing. Product increments require deployment to staging environments with successful team testing completion. Documentation must be written and updated to reflect implemented features accurately. User acceptance testing must pass, and product owners must provide formal approval before release. These criteria function as a formal contract between development teams and stakeholders, ensuring everyone uses consistent completion standards.

The benefits of this backward-thinking approach extend beyond clarity. Thorough DoD definitions reduce rework delays by establishing known criteria before marking items complete. Early-stage risk inspection through DoD steps allows teams to adapt and improve across multiple sprints. Quality assurance steps embedded in the DoD prevent defects from reaching customers, while cross-team validation at program levels ensures features from multiple teams integrate properly. The Definition of Done should be reviewed during sprint reviews to stay relevant as projects evolve and team capabilities mature. Product managers collaborate with architects, stakeholders, marketing, design, and testing to ensure the DoD checklist addresses all necessary quality dimensions from the beginning.

Critically, work not meeting DoD criteria should never count toward sprint velocity calculations. Incomplete items become technical debt that grows exponentially with each cycle. By defining “done” from the finish backward, teams create visible reference points for sprint planning, displayed prominently in team spaces, reducing misunderstandings and conflicts about completion status while ensuring every increment truly delivers customer value.

Related Posts

Disclaimer

The content on this website is provided for general informational purposes only. While we strive to ensure the accuracy and timeliness of the information published, we make no guarantees regarding completeness, reliability, or suitability for any particular purpose. Nothing on this website should be interpreted as professional, financial, legal, or technical advice.

Some of the articles on this website are partially or fully generated with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools, and our authors regularly use AI technologies during their research and content creation process. AI-generated content is reviewed and edited for clarity and relevance before publication.

This website may include links to external websites or third-party services. We are not responsible for the content, accuracy, or policies of any external sites linked from this platform.

By using this website, you agree that we are not liable for any losses, damages, or consequences arising from your reliance on the content provided here. If you require personalized guidance, please consult a qualified professional.